TRẦN ĐÌNH LÝ

Trang chủ NLU | NLS | Trang nhất | Sơ đồ trang | Help | Sơ đồ trường | Email - Wifi | Xem điểm | Học tập |Website Giảng viên|

Trang chủ Thông tin cá nhân Bài viết trên các báo Tư vấn - Hướng nghiệp Gởi thư liên hệ
Thống kê
Số lần xem
Đang xem 59
Toàn hệ thống 1977
Trong vòng 1 giờ qua
Trang liên kết

 

 

 

 

Thành viên

Email:
Password

Nội dung

  TS. Trần Đình Lý

friedman-arrow.jpg

In this morning’s New York Times, columnist Thomas Friedman makes a grave prediction regarding Obama and the ongoing financial crisis: “I fear that his whole first term could be eaten by Citigroup, A.I.G., Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, and the whole housing/subprime credit bubble we inflated these past 20 years.” Friedman is a three-time Pulitzer Prize winner, a staple of The New York Times, and a bestselling author, and thus this prediction should be taken very seriously—in some alternate universe where the news media is a meritocracy and Thomas Friedman is a competent observer of the world and its workings. The rest of us can probably relax.

Let's review:

In October of 2000, Friedman decided that the Chinese regime would soon find itself threatened by a major unemployment crisis caused by an influx of American wheat and sugar into that country. In fact, American wheat and sugar failed to make any inroads whatsoever, while Chinese unemployment figures (however unreliable they may be) remained at low levels for a period of seven years.
 

After the announcement of Colin Powell’s Secretary of State nomination in December 2000, a clearly impressed Friedman related to his readers that “it was impossible to imagine Mr. Bush ever challenging or overruling Mr. Powell on any issue,”  that Powell “can never be fired,” and that “Mr. Bush can never allow him to resign in protest over anything.” Five years later, Powell was out via “resignation” after having been consistently challenged and overruled by Bush, who must have missed Friedman's column.

In 2001, Friedman advised the American citizenry to “keep rootin’ for Putin,” hailing the K.G.B. veteran as “Russia’s first Deng Xiaoping” and a strong force for reform. Three years later, Friedman announced in his most awkward prose that “I have a ‘Tilt Theory of History’,” and called Russia “a huge nation” (this part checks out) “that was tilted in the wrong direction and is now tilted in the right direction” with regards to free speech, the rule of law, and the like. In 2007, Friedman finally noticed that Russia cannot even properly be termed a democracy and promptly wrote a column to this effect.

Then, a month into the Afghanistan conflict, Friedman complained that “the hand-wringing has already begun over how long this might last” and advised readers to “take a deep breath,” noting that Afghanistan is “far away.” Besides, Friedman had “no doubt, for now, that the Bush team has a military strategy for winning a long war.” A month later, he noted in passing that “America has won the war in Afghanistan” and that “the Taliban are gone,” though he did express some concern about “all the nonsense written in the press about the concern for 'civilian casualties’,”  a term he took to using with scare quotes. Seven years later, civilian casualties remain a major item of concern for Afghan’s in the non-won war against the non-gone Taliban.

In 2005, Friedman explained that it was necessary for Democrats “to start thinking seriously about Iraq” lest the party “become unimportant.” Though Democrats never came around to Friedman’s way of serious thinking , they did manage to take control of both chambers of Congress the following year, ushering in a period of nearly unprecedented political dominance that continues to this day, which strikes me as a pretty important thing to do.

Now, I don’t ask a lot of favors from the American citizenry and rarely even hit it up for money, but I was thinking that it might be kind of neat if everyone could stop pretending that  Friedman’s prognostication deserves to be taken seriously.

Also, could we key his car or something? This is a time for bold moves.

Barrett Brown is the author of Flock of Dodos: Behind Modern Creationism, Intelligent Design, and the Easter Bunny and serves as director of communications for Enlighten the Vote, previously known as GAMPAC.

Số lần xem trang : 14896
Nhập ngày : 05-03-2009
Điều chỉnh lần cuối :

Ý kiến của bạn về bài viết này


In trang này

Lên đầu trang

Gởi ý kiến

 

  Câu hỏi liên quan đến kỳ thi tuyển viên chức 2013(11-12-2013)

  Tài liệu thi tuyển viên chức, chuyển ngạch (2013-NLU)(02-12-2013)

  Năm 2011: Tương lai kinh tế thế giới về tay ai?(12-01-2011)

  Toan cau hoa va gia nhap WTO (bao cao cua TS.Le Dang Doanh tai Truong Dai hoc Nong Lam TPHCM)(12-04-2010)

  Cuộc chiến “săn đầu người” và việc giành giật thị phần (20-01-2010)

  Sinh viên khoái nhất... nói xấu người khác? (VNN 23/04/2009 )(23-04-2009)

  Bộ Giáo dục tuyển công chức(20-04-2009)

  Trường nâng chuẩn, sinh viên ồ ạt trượt chuẩn (Hanoinet )(20-04-2009)

  Bộ Giáo dục lấy ý kiến về việc bỏ thi đại học(20-04-2009)

  Đào tạo tín chỉ, nhiều trường khó đạt (Hanoinet )(20-04-2009)

Trang kế tiếp ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Website TS. Trần Đình Lý
Chức vụ: Phó Hiệu trưởng Trường Đại học Nông Lâm TP.HCM
Địa chỉ: Nhà Thiên Lý- Đại học Nông Lâm TP.HCM
ĐT: 028-38966780 - Fax: 028-38960713
Email: tdinhly(a)hcmuaf.edu.vn -Website:http://http://www2.hcmuaf.edu.vn/?ur=tdinhly

Thiết kế: Quản trị mạng- ĐHNL 2007